Police and Sheriff Civilian Oversight

A police officer's dark uniform with a body camera, badge, and pens clipped to the chest pocket.

Why we did this audit

We performed this audit due to concerns over the timeliness of the Police and Sheriff Departments’ misconduct investigations and the reporting of the Monitor’s Office’s activities.

Key facts

  • The Office of the Independent Monitor is the civilian oversight agency for the Denver Police Department and the Denver Sheriff Department.
  • The Monitor’s Office provides recommendations to improve the thoroughness of sworn personnel investigations and appropriateness of disciplinary actions, as well as to improve the departments’ policies and practices.
  • The Office of the Independent Monitor is the civilian oversight agency for the Denver Police Department and the Denver Sheriff Department.
  • The Monitor’s Office is required to publish an annual public report summarizing its oversight activities.

Why this matters

For decades, tension has existed between the public and the Police and Sheriff Departments — fracturing the trust placed in the departments that are intended to protect and serve the public. The Monitor’s Office has a responsibility to ensure sworn personnel are appropriately investigated and addressed when misconduct occurs to ensure accountability and to increase community trust.

Findings

FINDING 1 – Conflicting mandates and a perceived conflict of interest limits transparency and accountability

  • Denver Charter and city ordinance direct the Monitor’s Office to publicly report on recommendations it makes on investigations of officer and deputy misconduct cases, disciplinary actions, and policy reviews. However, a conflicting mandate prevents the Monitor’s Office from including those recommendations in its public reports. It also significantly limited what we could audit.

FINDING 2  The Monitor’s Office is not comprehensively reporting on the timeliness of misconduct investigations

  • Police and Sheriff Departments misconduct investigations are made up of multiple phases that contribute to the timeliness of an investigation. The Monitor’s Office is only reporting on a portion of the discipline review process.

FINDING 3  The Monitor’s Office’s record keeping does not differentiate between mandatory and discretionary case reviews

  • There are certain cases the Monitor’s Office is required to review. But without tracking this information, the office cannot demonstrate its compliance with city ordinance and this may be affecting the office’s ability to effectively prioritize its workload.

FINDING 4  The Monitor’s Office’s does not have a formalized strategic plan

  • Without one, it is unclear how the Monitor’s Office will efficiently and effectively meet its oversight responsibilities.

Recommendations

1.1 Determine and document whether requirements can be met – The Office of the Independent Monitor should:

  • Determine whether it can fulfill the city charter and city ordinance requirements to publicly share recommendations for investigations, discipline, and policy reviews.
  • Document its considerations, conclusions, and any limitations related to the deliberative process privilege.

If needed, work with the Citizen Oversight Board and the City Council to clarify its authority, responsibility, and limitations in city charter and city ordinance.

Office of the Independent Monitor  Agree, Implementation Date March 31, 2026

1.2 Reevaluate policy – The Office of the Independent Monitor should reevaluate whether its policy of submitting its public reports to the City Attorney’s Office for review is required, documenting its considerations, and its conclusions. This may include exercising its chartered right to obtain an opinion from independent legal counsel.

Office of the Independent Monitor  Agree, Implementation DateMarch 31, 2026

2.1 Publicly report investigation timeliness – The Office of the Independent Monitor should conduct a comprehensive timeliness analysis of the review process and include it in its annual report. This analysis should include a breakdown of time spent on each phase and party involved. 

Office of the Independent Monitor  Agree, Implementation Date March 15, 2026

3.1 Update database and track results – The Office of the Independent Monitor should, at a minimum, update its database to include a data field to distinguish between mandatory and discretionary case reviews and track the results in its regular internal reporting.

Office of the Independent Monitor Agree, Implementation DateMarch 31, 2026

4.1 Develop a strategic plan – The Office of the Independent Monitor should develop and publish a strategic plan that establishes a mission, vision, and strategic goals for the office, including developing metrics to track progress toward those goals.

Office of the Independent Monitor Agree, Implementation DateJune 30, 2026

4.2 Implement the strategic plan – The Office of the Independent Monitor should implement the strategic plan from Recommendation 4.1 by identifying action plans, assigning roles and responsibilities, identifying timelines, and monitoring progress.

Office of the Independent Monitor  Agree, Implementation Date Sept. 30, 2026

Auditor's Letter

September 18, 2025

We audited Police and Sheriff Departments’ civilian oversight by the Office of the Independent Monitor to determine whether the office is effectively carrying out its oversight responsibilities. I now present the results of this audit.

The audit found conflicting mandates and a perceived conflict of interest limits transparency and accountability, the timeliness of misconduct investigations are not comprehensively reported, record keeping does not differentiate between mandatory and discretionary case reviews, and the office lacks a strategic plan.

By implementing recommendations for establishing clearer expectations for conflicting mandates, comprehensive reporting of the timeliness of investigations, improving record keeping, and developing a strategic plan, the Monitor’s Office will be better able to carry out its oversight responsibilities.

This performance audit is authorized pursuant to the City and County of Denver Charter, Article V, Part 2, § 1, “General Powers and Duties of Auditor.” We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.

We appreciate the leaders and team members at the Office of the Independent Monitor who shared their time and knowledge with us during the audit. Please contact me at 720-913-5000 with any questions..

Denver Auditor's Office

Auditor's Signature
Timothy O'Brien, CPA


Timothy O'Brien Official Headshot

AUDITOR TIMOTHY O'BRIEN, CPA
Denver Auditor


Denver Auditor's Office

201 W. Colfax Ave. #705 Denver, CO 80202
Emailauditor@denvergov.org
Call: 720-913-5000
Follow us on Facebook     Connect with us on Twitter

Auditors Office Logos for Footer: Denver Auditor, Denver Labor