Skip navigation

CURRENT LEGISLATION

 

PASSED: Public Safety Enforcement Priorities Act

Co-Sponsored by Council Members Paul Lopez and Robin Kniech

The Denver Public Safety Enforcement Priorities Act memorializes existing city policies and practices limiting our role in immigration enforcement and clarifies several new policies. This proposal is designed to reduce fear within immigrant and refugee communities and clarifies to everyone that Denver is not engaging in immigration enforcement.

 

Why Did We File This Ordinance?

  • When immigrants fear city involvement in immigration enforcement they are less likely to trust police or fire officials, to report emergencies, or to testify or appear at court. Our entire community is safest when everyone trusts the city and utilizes law enforcement agencies.

Five Thirty Eight analysis of Denver police data found a disturbing drop in the rate of Latinos reporting crime. “In Denver, crime reports among non-Latinos increased 3.6 percent in the first three months of 2017 compared with the same period last year; among Latinos, crime reports fell 12 percent.” While not all Latinos are immigrants, many of Denver’s immigrants are Latinos and the timing of this trend raises serious concerns for all residents.

  • While many of Denver’s practices appropriately limit the city’s role in immigration enforcement, which is a federal responsibility, most of our practices are not in writing, others are in internal policies that could be changed without public notice, and there are a few notable gaps.

  • An Ordinance will ensure city employees and the community understand that Denver’s priority is local trust in our city’s safety agencies, the rules that we will follow, and to clarify that while we comply with federal law, we do not assist with civil federal immigration enforcement beyond what the law requires.

 

What Would This Ordinance Do?

  1. Memorialize existing City policy by prohibiting the detention of individuals beyond their sentence.
    The City ceased honoring civil detainers, not accompanied by a judicial warrant, pursuant to court decisions in 2013, but that change has not yet been incorporated into city code.
                a. Already prohibited by 4th Amendment of Constitution.
                b. Unless there is a judicial warrant.

  2. Memorialize predominant City practices by prohibiting City employees from collecting information on immigration or citizenship status.
    This information is rarely required by law and most departments report that they do not ask for or collect it. Formalizing the policy of not collecting immigration or citizenship information clarifies the policy for all city employees, minimizes the risk of inadvertent collection, as well as the risk of having to provide information beyond the scope of our City duties once it is collected. 
                a. Except where already required by state or federal law.
                b. This includes Denver County Court who perform a range of services including pre-trial services, county court                 probation and community corrections.

  3. Prohibit the sharing of any other information about individuals for purposes of immigration enforcement.
    Most departments report that they do not share information, except where already required by state or federal law, but the bill will also close any gaps in current practices.
                a. The Sheriff’s Department will continue to provide notifications of release to the extent they are able.
                b. Individuals involved must be notified and advised of their legal rights.
                c. City will begin collecting better data and reporting on it quarterly to allow for analysis.

  4. Memorialize predominant practices by prohibiting use of city resources or city cooperation with civil immigration enforcement, including prohibiting providing access to secure areas or facilities.
    While most departments report that they do not cooperate or assist with civil immigration enforcement, in the past the jail has provided immigration agents access to secure jail areas and inmates for interviews absent a judicial warrant. This ordinance would prohibit law enforcement from engaging in immigration enforcement, on their own or with federal officials, and would restrict access to private areas or inmates absent a warrant.
                a. Unless there is a judicial warrant.
                b. Except where already required by federal law.
                c. Allows police to coordinate on criminal enforcement actions, including criminal joint task forces, (i.e. gang                 suppression) or to respond to a scene where doing so is necessary to protect public safety or to enforce                 state or city criminal laws.

 

Other Efforts Being Undertaken

There is a strong commitment to continue conversations and take further steps to protect the rights of our immigrant communities:

  • Establishment of a legal defense fund

  • Criminal Justice reform that touches our entire community

  • Preventing discrimination against individuals on the basis of immigration status

  • Monitoring data and practices in the city to ensure effective education and  training to address new and changing conditions as they emerge

 

 

 

Important Documents

Media

  • KDVR: Full Media Conference Video
  • Denver Post: Denver Mayor Michael Hancock and council members reach immigration policy agreement — but hold back details
  • Denverite: Denver leaders to introduce joint plan to protect immigrant rights in face of ICE
  • Denverite: Denver "won't be bullied or blackmailed," mayor says as city officials propose limiting cooperation with ICE
  • KDVR: Mayor: Denver is not engaging in immigration enforcement
  • Denver Post: New Denver immigration proposal keeps most restrictions proposed by council, but allows ICE jail release notifications
  • 9 News: Denver reaches compromise on immigration ordinance
  • Westword: City Council and Mayor Come Together in New Immigration Legislation